GeneralAntitheticMethod

HomePage | Memberswill go by tor | RecentChanges | Join |

Suppose we want to calculate the expectation of some function of a normal random variable E(f(X))E(f(X)). Instead of using the estimator

1N i=1 Nf(X i)\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N f(X_i)

(1)

it is well-known that we can use the estimator

12N i=1 Nf(X i)+f(X i)\frac{1}{2N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} f(X_i)+f(-X_i)

(2)

It can be trivially verified that the second estimator has smaller variance than that of the first estimator. What if XX is not normal when it could be non-symmetric or discrete ?

Note that all random variables have something to do with uniform-zero-one distribution: let A(x)A(x) be the accumulated density, i.e. and UA(x) ≡ \Pr(X \leq xU be a uniform-zero-one random variable, then the number Xmin{x|UA(x)}X \equiv \min\{x |U \leq A(x)\} has A(x)A(x) as its accumulated density.

Because 1U1 - U is also a uniform-zero-one random variable, therefore we can have this estimator:

12N i=1 Nf(min{x|U iA(x)})+f(min{x|1U iA(x)})\frac{1}{2N} \sum_{i=1}^N f(\min\{x |U_i \leq A(x)\}) + f(\min\{x |1 - U_i \leq A(x)\})

(3)

It can also be trivially verified that this estimator has (1) as its special case and smaller variance.